Pe masura ce vacanta se termina si scoala se apropie, si eu nu-mi vad capul de treburi, nu prea mai am timp de lucruri, decat ceva presa in timpul mesei la servici si serialul din timpul cinei (Calculator nou? Checked! Time to play with it?Canci!Go Anca, you have 2 processors to play Zuma with). Mai am niste jocuri online pe care le mai click-click de cateva ori pe zi, dar, cel putin pana pe la jumatatea lui octombrie, ma indoiesc ca mai am timp de role-playing pe forumuri.
V-am mai spus de Nationstates, un site in care iti conduci tara prin niste setari foarte simpliste (comparativ cu celelalte zone unde mai „exist”, Cybernations, OGame, Ikariam, Galactic Imperia, Global Wars –suna impresionant, nu? in 20 de click-uri le rezolvi pe toate). Cel putin la Nationstates si Cybernations (in care actiunea se intampla o data pe zi) toata distractia este pe forumuri, unde fiecare se simte lider in parcare, bate campii despre conflicte imaginare din propria tartacuta sau distribuite in retea intre mai multe capete la fel de pline. Duse sunt vremurile cand aveam timp de asa ceva zilnic.
Anyway, intro-ul asta este ca sa va spun cum am ajuns la tipul asta, Max Bary, un australian care a scris niste romane vreo 3 romane sf si care la un moment dat s-a gandit sa faca un site (nationstates) de promovare a unei carti. S-a declarat fericit daca are 10000 de utilizatori, a primit 300.000. Recunosc ca, desi sunt veteran al site-ului, n-am citit cartile, dar ii citesc blogul, pentru umorul australian (imbinare a finetii britanice si-a tupeului american).
Iata si o mostra (finally, to the point!). In Nationstates puteai adera la ONU, vazut ca loc in care se propuneau motiuni („in toate statele ONU este interzis traficul cu fiinte umane”), devenite obligatorii pentru aderenti (ca in realitate). „Clearly this wasn’t anything the real UN wanted to be associated with”.
The other day I was digging through my Junk folder when I found an e-mail from the United Nations. I know what you’re thinking: “Wow! That is one politically astute mail filter.” But pretty much all email to my public address without the word “duck” in the subject, as requested in my contact page, gets flagged as spam, and the UN chose not to do that. Apparently arbitrary yet effective protocols for ensuring open communication aren’t something the UN wants anything to do with. Or maybe they have something against ducks. I don’t know. Whatever the reason, they went with the subject, “Notice of cease and desist.”
Naturally, it was about NationStates. It’s always about NationStates. I have [in my books] Nike shooting teenagers and Coke marketing Fukk, that’s no problem. But one player says something mean to another in my web game and they’re going to sue me into oblivion. Anyway, what upset the United Nations was that I put them into NationStates. It’s the place where players come together to debate and pass international law; in the five years the game has been running, they’ve implemented privacy safeguards, promoted religious tolerance, passed a universal bill of rights, and outlawed child labor, amongst 240 other resolutions.
Clearly this wasn’t anything the real UN wanted to be associated with:
Dear Mr. Barry,
It has come to our attention that you are operating an online game called “NationStates”, www.nationstates.net, and that this game uses the UN name and emblem, without authorization…
We therefore demand that you immediately cease and desist from using the United Nations name and emblem in the above-referenced online game, and that in the future you refrain from using or making any reference to them in connection with your activities.
[ Full Letter ]
But they did have a point. In 2002, I whacked the United Nations into my game, complete with copyrighted emblem, not so much in parody as to say, “Hey, look, this is just like the real UN.” I can’t remember ever thinking about the legal consequences; I probably assumed that even if the UN noticed, they’d have plenty of blood-thirsty dictators and international war crimes to prosecute before me. But what with Saddam behind bars and all that world peace you’ve been hearing so much about, I guess they worked their way down to me.
I wondered whether it was worth fighting. It would probably be eight years before they got inspections organized, and by then I could keep moving my UN references around where they wouldn’t find them. And it could be great fun. I could represent myself and wear cheap suits and tell the court that it was on trial. But for that to work, I would need an opponent who might actually be embarrassed by the expense and public profile involved in a petty IP lawsuit, and I just wasn’t confident the UN falls into that category. That the single biggest label on the front page of the UN web site is “Copyright, United Nations, 2008” struck me as an ill omen. Also, I do support the UN. I mean, sure, it’s about as functional as a cat with 192 heads, and a lot of those heads are corrupt. But at least they’re trying. At least the heads have to look at each other. I feel like if I’m going into legal battle with somebody, it probably shouldn’t be an organization whose foremost goal is world peace.
Plus I got a lawyer’s opinion, and he said I was blatantly in the wrong. So I decided to cave.
So now I have to rename my UN. I was tempted to go with something a little insulting, like “Discordant Nations,” or “Ridiculously Petty Bureaucracy of Nations Who Should Have Better Things To Do.” But no, that would be sinking to their level. NationStates now has a “World Assembly.”